![]() ![]() Science is descriptive, that is, it describes what happens without any say in what the rules are, the only thing it can do is write them down and make predictions based on them Is it? what falsifiable demarcation (such as hunting something to extinction) would render this untrue? What plague or migration of "super predators" isn't part of this "emergent eb and flow"? Populations come from other populations (as Darwin mentioned in the 1850s) This eb and flow of population sizes is an emergent property. On an island where the predators are unable to eat fish, yes, there is evidence of this. Especially men telling (and expecting) things to "behave"Īre you aware of the difference between descriptive and prescriptive rules? Science is descriptive, that is, it describes what happens without any say in what the rules are, the only thing it can do is write them down and make predictions based on them.Ī population of predators will eat from the population of preyĪlong with other things "lower on the food chain" based on ecology. Gee that's funny, those "rules" seem to be written by man. The only place where a mind would come in here is to count the populations over successive years but that won't affect the cycle itself. ![]() Which in turn allows the predator population to grow again. This then allows the prey population to grow again. However that reduces the size of the prey population which lead to less food for the predator. A population of predators will eat from the population of prey. I just haven't seen evidence of this without men (and women) being involved.įor example the predator-prey dynamic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |